2. The fact that the defendant recognized all his mistake and reflected his mistake is favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant had already been punished for the same kind of crime several times, and even if he had been punished for repeated crimes for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim company even though he did not compensate for the damage, and other circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., if taken into account equally, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.