beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.02.09 2016가단21409

자동차소유권이전등록절차인수 등

Text

1. The Defendant’s acquisition by transfer on October 1, 2015 of the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 10, 2015, the Plaintiffs registered the ownership of the automobiles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant automobiles”) as Plaintiff A1% and Plaintiff B9% shares.

B. While Plaintiff A’s East D used the instant vehicle, it was proposed that “I will return the instant vehicle to E after using it for seven days for display in the middle and high-speed trading complex, and offer money for rental expenses,” and delivered the instant vehicle to E on September 15, 2015.

C. D filed a theft report with the police on September 27, 2015, even though E did not return the instant vehicle.

On October 4, 2015, the police investigation revealed that the Defendant occupied the instant vehicle.

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant, at the police, informed the F on September 22, 2015, that “A certificate of personal seal impression, certificate of automobile transfer, certificate for public guarantee, power of delegation for subscription, consent and consent to purchase and use of the vehicle, certificate of possessory possession, certificate of delegation, certificate of transfer and purchase of the vehicle, certificate of deposit, certificate of installment performance, certificate of delivery and sale of the vehicle, certificate of vehicle, certificate of delivery and sale of the vehicle, and letter of acceptance of the vehicle until now after payment of KRW 12,00,00.”

Plaintiff

A paid KRW 294,430, and KRW 900,000, respectively, of the first half of 2015, the first half of 2016, the first half of 2016, the second half of 2016, and the second half of 2016, while the instant lawsuit was pending.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence 1-3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The allegations by the parties have the obligation to take over the transfer registration procedure on the instant motor vehicle since the Defendant acquired the instant motor vehicle around October 2015, and there is a duty to compensate the Plaintiffs for taxes imposed on the Plaintiffs after October 2015 and for damages caused by illegal acts.