However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 20, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the credit support of the Suwon Flag Flag method, and on January 8, 2016, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for the same crime, but on February 1, 2018, the Defendant driven a vehicle with approximately 1 knife under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.125% in the blood alcohol concentration on the part of approximately 1 knife at the time of innju to the front day of the apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver working at the home, report of the circumstances of the driver working at home and report of the circumstances of the driver working at home;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (in compliance with the provisions of the Act and subordinate statutes twice the same type of force);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (referring to driving under influence of alcohol) applicable to the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment for imprisonment, and the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant is highly likely to repeat a crime because he/she has a number of records of punishment due to drinking driving or driving without a license.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the age, environment, motive, circumstances, etc. of the defendant.