However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “C” in Gyeonggi-si B.

In spite of being prohibited from engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, the defendant employed a female employee D at the above sexual traffic business establishment on April 30, 2018, received 130,000 won in return for sexual traffic from the guest who found the above business establishment, and arranged to have sexual intercourse with the female employees from the 29th of the same month to the 30th of the same month, and arranged to have them sexual intercourse with the sexual intercourse in the room established in the above business establishment from the 29th of the same month to the 30th of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The scope of recommended punishment on the grounds of sentencing guidelines under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is six months to one year. While Defendant has the record of having been punished for the same kind of crime on one occasion, the sentencing shall be determined by taking into account the fact that there is no other criminal record, and the period of crime is not more than two days.