If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On November 17, 2012, around 06:21, the Defendant: (a) exercised as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, and instead acquired the taxi fee of KRW 18,300 on the part of the victim B (the 56-year-old) who believed to be true by using it as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee; and (b) obtained the taxi fee of KRW 18,300 on the part of the victim B (the 56-year-old-old)

2. Property damage Defendant demanded the victim to pay the taxi charges at the time and place under the above paragraph (1), and destroyed by drinking an empty light, which is equivalent to 35,00 won at the market price attached to the front door of the taxi, by “I am feasia.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of an empty sign, etc. damaged;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;