Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

On April 12, 2014, at around 16:40, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, such as plucking, plucking, plucking, etc., of the fat around the fat of the Gumi-si, in order to prevent the Defendant from misrepresenting the public official and attaching the fat around the cat of the Gumi-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to include some of the statements made to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant, on April 14, 2014, at around 19:56, failed to attach a new leaflet to the Defendant in the Gumi City G room; (b) the Defendant fighting the body of the victim, such as booming the breath from the above victim to dump so that he can not do so; and (c) breathing the victim’s hand, booming the breath, pushing the victim’s hand, breathing the victim’s hand, breathing the victim’s hand, damaging the breathm of the mouth, and booming the victim’s breathy, etc.; (d) however, in light of the Defendant’s assault and the degree of assault revealed in the investigative agency’s statement and the victim’s investigative agency’s statement, the Defendant was found not guilty on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to acknowledge the victim’s assault.