요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Examining various facts recognized in the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, comparing and comparing them with the grounds for recognition, the fact-finding of the judgment of the first instance and its-based judgments are all justifiable.
This paper examines each of the evidence Nos. 24 and No. 52 submitted by the plaintiff in the appellate trial by adding it to the above grounds for recognition.
Pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the reasons for the judgment of the first instance shall be cited for this
The following is added to the assertion that the plaintiff is repeated, modified or added in the appellate court, and the judgment on it.
The Plaintiff asserts that, even though he was found to have weak physical and mental abilities of the Plaintiff at the time of entry, the Plaintiff had frequently flive shift work and excessive work at the instant workplace even though he was found to have a weak result in the examination of the ability to adapt to the organization at the time of entry, the Plaintiff’s physical and mental abilities occurred due to a WIG disorder of the Plaintiff, and that the ebbbbs of the ebstinous disease occurred, not around July 2014
However, according to the comprehensive examination of all the evidence submitted in this case, the plaintiff had shown the truth of the Chon's death before entering the workplace of this case around April 2014.
After the entry, the plaintiff was subject to collective harassment or bullying in the vocational training process.
There is no sufficient evidence to recognize that a person was suffering from an additional physical disability due to frequent shift work and excessive work after being placed at a production team.
In addition, the company retains data on this issue.
There is no evidence to suspect that it was concealed or concealed.
Even if a person suffers from an additional disability due to a shift work and excess work, it is difficult to recognize that the biological factors of the plaintiff's brain were rapidly occurring or aggravated due to the occurrence or aggravation of the disaster.
Therefore, we cannot accept the plaintiff's assertion.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim.