beta
대전지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단1265

업무방해등

Text

1. Defendant A’s fine of KRW 10,000,000, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 4,000,000, Defendant C’s fine of KRW 6,000,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operates the “J Maintenance Inspector” and is a person engaged in the comprehensive motor vehicle maintenance business at the same place; Defendant B is a person engaged in the motor vehicle inspection agency business at the same location; Defendant C is a person engaged in the unregistered motor vehicle maintenance business, such as motor vehicle maintenance, in the trade name of “K” in its neighborhood; Defendant D is a person engaged in the unregistered motor vehicle maintenance business within the trade name of “L” in the above “J Maintenance Inspector”; Defendant E is a person engaged in the unregistered motor vehicle maintenance business in the trade name of “M” in its neighborhood; Defendant F is a person engaged in the unregistered motor vehicle maintenance business under the trade name of “N” in the above “J Maintenance Inspector.”

1. Where the owner of a motor vehicle intends to modify matters prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, such as the length, width, height, body of a motor vehicle, loading device, etc. among the structures and devices of a motor vehicle which can load cargo of at least one ton of business, he/she shall file an application for approval of alteration of structures and devices in advance with the Korea Transportation Safety Authority, and obtain approval of alteration of structures and devices from the victim, and where the registered comprehensive motor vehicle maintenance business operator has issued a certificate of completion of alteration of structures and devices in accordance with the above approval, and then submit the relevant documents, such as a certificate of completion of alteration of structures and devices

Defendant

The Defendants A and B’s co-offenders issued a false certificate of completion of alteration work of structure and devices, as they did not perform alteration work of a truck at the self-maintenance inspection site of Defendant A’s operation without obtaining approval of alteration of structure from the Korea Transportation Safety Authority.