(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고단3071
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction around 10:54 on February 18, 1998, committed by the defendant's employee, who is the summary of the facts charged;
2. Since the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, the Defendant is acquitted in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문