beta
대전지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고정1120

모욕

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was aware of the fact that there was a conflict between the victim H, who is a doctor of the “G hospital” and the “I pharmacy” pharmacist in the same building as the “G hospital,” and the “I pharmacy” pharmacist in the same building as the above hospital, due to the sale to the patients by J, etc., Defendant A, on August 5, 2014, posted a statement on the Internet NAVER guide site (www.map .naver.com)’s search results of the above G hospital’s above G hospital’s search on around the Daejeon-gu Daejeon Building 302 around August 5, 2014, stating that “the victim was not fluorous,” and insulting the victim.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 약사인바, 위 1. 항 기재 ‘F’ 사이트를 통해 피해자와 J 간에 갈등이 있다는 사실을 알게 되자 2014. 8. 6. 9:28 경 전주시 덕진구 L 105동 1503호 자신의 집에서 컴퓨터를 이용하여 인터넷 네이버 지도 사이트 (www .map .naver .com) 의 위 G 병원 검색 결과 화면에 ‘ 전형적인 앞뒤가 다른 의사 다 신 안 간다 퉤퉤’ 라는 댓 글을 게시하여 피해자를 모욕하였다.

3. When Defendant C came to know of the conflict between the victim and J through “M” as above, Defendant C was a pharmacist, around August 5, 2014, at around the Defendant’s home located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul N101 Dong 301 Dong-gu, Seoul around August 5, 2014, Defendant C’s search results of the above G hospital’s search results on the screen “W.map.naver.com.com.”

We can not see our Republic of Korea

“The victim was insulting by posting comments on “the comments” and insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement by the witness J;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A criminal investigation report (a criminal suspect A's hearing report);

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to the evidence (faging data on the screen);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of which is a provisional payment order;