야생생물보호및관리에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The illegality is excluded because it had different knowledge of the nature of the reasons for appeal, not the permitted area, and is erroneous as a legitimate capture activity within the permitted area.
2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant argued the same as the above, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail with the statement of the defendant's argument and its judgment under the title "as to the defendant's and his defense counsel's argument". When comparing the above judgment of the court below with records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misunderstanding
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.