However, the Defendants are above two years from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The instant C e-mail fraud organization’s conspiracy with the instant C e-mail fraud organization transmits false English e-mail to the effect that the victim has a large inheritance amount, and where the victim appears to have an interest and gives an answer, the victim acquires money continuously from the victim by deceiving the victim that the attorney’s cost and the contract cost with the bank are necessary to receive the above inheritance amount.

The Defendants: (a) was an organization of the instant e-mail fraud organization; (b) C e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-bank staff member E in the territory of the Republic of Korea, on March 1, 2016, deposited the inheritance amount of USD 10,854,930 to the victim F, who was one of the natives of Russian nationality, “F, who was a relative of the party (victim) for the party (victim), deposited the inheritance amount of USD 10,854,930 for the party (victim) in the C e-mail D

“A false English e-mail is sent, and thereafter, H H H law firm’s defense is needed for the victim to receive USD 10,854,930 of the inheritance amount of the party (victim) to receive USD 10,854,930.

“ false English e-mail is sent, and J, K, L, M, and N, an employee of the said attorney-at-law, received the said attorney-at-law’s activity expenses, etc. from abroad immediately, and thereafter, the Defendants, the vice president of the O bank located in the U.S. and the O bank employees of the O bank called the name “P, the vice president of the O bank located in the U.S.,” keep USD 10,854,930 in the O bank on August 3, 2016. In order to transfer them to the account of the Korean bank of the party, the preparation of the contract and the cost of authentication is required.

The Defendants, who are employees in charge, send the Republic of Korea, purchase airline tickets and hotels for the above employees, prepare a contract with the above employees, and pay USD 7,500 to the above employees," and then the Defendants were employees of the U.S. bank.