If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. From March 28, 2012, when the Defendant had opposed to the salesroom of the building C in the city of Kuju-si, the Defendant destroyed the goods used by the public office accompanied by the name of the customer glass, on the ground that the Defendant did not accept a request for an interview with the prime market during the fact that the approval for the use of the building C in the State of Kuju-si, the office of Kuju-si, which was located on the 7th floor of Kuju-si, had been against the salesroom of the building C in the city of Kuju-si, on March 28, 2012, on the ground that the request for an interview with the prime market was not accepted.

2. On March 28, 2012, at the same place as the preceding paragraph at around 09:50 on March 28, 2012, there is an interview between the member of the shopping district and the original market on the shop sales problem of the said C building.

In conclusion, because the original state market was lost due to the failure to make a conclusion, the author gets up the chair for the meeting, and then damaged the object used by the public office by putting up the chair for the meeting, which is equivalent to 195,000 won for the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Related photographs (No. 2 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Application of investigation reports (Evidence No. 17 No.) and attached statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;