However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates "C Gameland" in Gangwon-gun B, and D and E are working as an employee in the above game area.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible and intangible results (referring to game money prescribed by Presidential Decree and things similar thereto prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as score, premiums and virtual currency used in game) acquired through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, in collusion with D and E, from July 4, 2014 to April 27, 2015, the Defendant established 51 game machine “fashacker” in the above game room, and operated the above game room by means of exchanging the scores in cash equivalent to the same amount if the game machine acquired through the use of the game for many unspecified game customers, such as F, etc. exceeds 20,000.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with D and E for the purpose of exchanging points obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the suspect against Defendant D by the prosecution (including E substitute part);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on documentary evidence, documentary evidence CDs, and seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (6-1 year and 6 months) of the Act on the Use and Provision of Illegal Game Products / [the decision of sentence] the above illegal exchange act by the defendant needs to be strictly punished with social harm, such as encouraging the public’s spirit of gambling and hindering sound labor practice, but the same kind of punishment is like.