On April 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months from the Daegu District Court for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On December 19, 2012, the Defendant completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on December 19, 2012. On July 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years from the Seoul High Court for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the judgment

The Defendant, around 04:40 on June 10, 2013, had the victim B (31 years of age) and a brupted place in the fourth room of the Seoul detention center located in 143, Manyang-si, Manyang-ro, 143.

B. The victim's face part of the victim's face due to both drinking and salivation was damaged by the unexploiting of treatment days in the number of times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of each police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Each police statement made against B, C, and D;

1. Each investigation report (to submit a photograph of harming the victim, to attach a copy of the register of obligations of the victim, and to submit a diagnosis report of the victim);

1. For each previous conviction in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to legal statements, inquiry into criminal records, and investigation reports (verification of a case during a suspect's trial proceedings and confirmation of the progress of a A trial proceedings);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The sentencing guidelines on the grounds of sentencing under the latter part of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for concurrent crimes: The sentence of imprisonment between April and June shall be based on the general injury resulting from violent crimes (no special person shall be sentenced): the crime of this case is committed while the defendant is detained for two months after being released from prison, even though there are several criminal punishments, the crime of this case is committed while the defendant was detained for two months after being released from prison. Compensation for the damage is not made, and the attitude of partially transferring the responsibility to the victim rather than the serious reflectness, and the final judgment becomes final and conclusive.