However, with respect to Defendant B, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants are siblings. At around 00:12 on October 26, 2014, at the second floor of the building located in Ansan-si, the second floor of the building located in Ansan-si, the second floor of the building, where the victim F is willing to multiple times to use Defendant A’s face and body, and find the victim who resides in the above building 15, the victim was frighted to use the victim’s face by drinking and drinking, and the victim was forced to control the victim’s face by drinking, and the defendant was flick-car (20cm in the blade length, 32 cm in the total length) which is a dangerous object prepared in advance.

As a result, the Defendants carried a knife, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim's knife's left side of the treatment days, and the knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements and their defense counsel asserted that there is no fatt with Defendant B’s time, Defendant A did not have a knife F’s development, and Defendant A’s series of acts constituted self-defense.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence, i.e., (i) the victim F opened a door outside of the room by the investigative agency to the extent that the Defendants, who are the siblings, opened the door, (ii) the Defendants were faced with their face, and (iii) the Defendants, who followed, stated that they reached the knife in their own knife, and (iv) the Defendants and the victims got into knife; (iii) the Defendants and the victims were able to fight from the investigative agency to this court; and (iv) the victim’s room to the victim’s room; and (v) the Defendants were made a statement that they were faced with the victim. In light of the fact that the Defendants and the victims were faced with the victim’s speech, the victims were able to have become the victim at the time of committing the crime.