When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 2015, the Defendant, around January 2015, concluded that, at a cafeteria located in the trade incompeting place in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim B, “A restaurant is being constructed at the time Iksan-si, and her husband does not go to a son while the divorce lawsuit is pending, and the Defendant borrowed money to be used as the studio deposit. It would receive consolation money for divorce later.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not build a restaurant, and did not receive consolation money because he did not proceed with a divorce lawsuit with her husband, and the victim thought that money borrowed from her will be consumed by means of living expenses, entertainment expenses, repayment of personal debts, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money as agreed to by the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving him/her from the victim to the post office account (C) under the name of the Defendant, was KRW 2 million on February 12, 2015, KRW 1 million on February 25, 2015, KRW 300,000 on the 26th of the same month, and the same year.

4.6.3 million won was remitted, and the sum of 3.6 million won was acquired through fraud over four times in total.

2. Around May 2015, the defrauded made a false statement to the victim as stated in paragraph 1(1) of the above Article by phoneing the victim around the following: (a) on May 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) borrowed money as a security deposit and premium; and (c) later, (d) borrowed money in return for consolation money upon divorce.

However, the Defendant did not have a plan to operate a head office, and did not have to receive consolation money as stated in the above Paragraph 1. The Defendant thought that money borrowed from the victim would have been consumed by means of living expenses, entertainment expenses, and personal debt repayment. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money as promised to the victim.

Nevertheless, as above, the defendant deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (D) account under the name of the defendant, the amount of KRW 3 million on June 3, 2015, and the same month.

5.4.1 million won, as the same.