However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on October 21, 1987. A.

On August 10, 2012, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B and once in a room in which it is impossible to know the family room of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Maurel.

B. The Defendant was on August 2012, 201.

At the place of subsection B and once, sexual intercourse was made.

C. The Defendant was on September 2012, 201.

At the place of subsection B and once. D.

On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant, at a room where it is impossible to know the mutual felbel's room located in the Jeju Jeju Jeju Gotdo, Gosi-si, Dana, B and once.

E. The Defendant was a policeman on September 2012.

At the place of subsection B and once, sexual intercourse was made.

Accordingly, the defendant was sent to the above B more than five times.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the same time and place as the above, the Defendant had sexual intercourses with A five times, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: The first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act: the second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;