2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant is against whom he/she is unable to repeat the crime; and (b) the defendant is deemed to have no record of being punished for the same crime; (c) the crime of this case is committed from March 29, 2013 to the same year.

5. The term of the crime is long-term and considerable size of the game room, and the defendant's criminal liability is heavy. The defendant attempted to keep the CCTV and door door door door door door from committing a crime is poor, and the defendant employed not less than 10 employees within 24 hours and operated business within 24 hours, and the defendant's age, character, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime are committed, etc., the sentencing of the court below is judged to be appropriate in light of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, motive, means and result, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.