However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

around 22:10 on October 1, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, in front of C main points located in Ansan-si B, the Defendant: (b) expressed that, in order to verify the reported content against the Defendant, the reporter, the head of the Dongan-gu Police Station D District Unit of the Ansan-gu Police Station, the Defendant sent out after receiving 112 reports; (c) took mobile phone on the floor without any particular reason; and (d) expressed that, “I am fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fyp fy; (d) fying E’s chest by hand, fying

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a witness statement of the F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The grounds for suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act include the fact that the accused has a criminal record of violent crimes, and other various conditions of sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of crimes and circumstances before and after crimes, shall be determined as the same as the order;