However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Theft and damage to public documents;

A. On January 8, 2014, around 08:35, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft, leading up to the gap in which the victim E’s market value was approximately KRW 50,000, which was set up in front of the joint wholesale market located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and was negligent in the victim’s surveillance.

B. On January 8, 2014, around 20:00, the Defendant was at the investigation station of Chungcheongbuk-si and the statement recording room of a strong team, located in the 60-ro, Cheongju-si.

As stated in paragraph (1), the suspect interrogation protocol, which is a public document, received after undergoing an investigation on the charge of theft of E’s property, was teared in good faith, and the contents written in the investigation process are different, while inspecting the suspect interrogation protocol prepared during the investigation process, the suspect interrogation protocol, which is a public document, was teared eight copies of the suspect interrogation protocol.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged public documents used by public offices.

2. Intrusion upon a building, theft, and damage to public property;

A. On January 13, 2014, at around 15:00, the Defendant intruded into the back of the restaurant through the gate opened in the “H restaurant” operated by the victim G located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and stolen two, in advance, a stringr for business use, the market price of which is approximately KRW 200,000, and approximately KRW 400,000, the market price of which is the victim’s ownership, located in the cafeteria.

B. The Defendant, around January 14, 2014, operated by the said victim G around 15:00.

Before entering the port, the victim did a restaurant, and the victim took a creb in which surveillance was neglected, and then took the creb in the creb in which the victim's market value was approximately approximately KRW 1,00,000,000, the victim's market value, which was the victim's possession, was cut off.

C. The Defendant B.

After a flagrant offender is arrested on suspicion of theft of the G-owned property, such as described in the paragraph.