특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
There is no misunderstanding of facts that the defendant has assaulted a victim who was operating a taxi.
The sentence of imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.
Judgment
The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) while the victim was operating a taxi on the date of the instant case from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim was aware of the fact that the Defendant, a customer, was "free repair community hall" and was driving the taxi at all times; (ii) the Defendant, who passed the J-Mat in E, was aware of the fact that he was "I am I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am on the back of the instant case; and (iii) the victim was 2 times the right side of the victim's statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court of the court; and (iv) the victim was able to make a false statement from the police agency to the effect that he was not able to make a statement in detail and detailed statement by the victim.