2. The Defendant asserts that he did not lead the crime.

However, the amount of the fraud of this case is very large, and the damage has not been restored to all up to now, and the defendant has the same ability to punish.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.

(However, as it is obvious that “two years and ten months of imprisonment” in the first head of the crime in the judgment of the court below is a clerical error of “two years of imprisonment and two years of imprisonment,” the court shall correct that as above.