1. Defendant B is punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant C is punished by a fine of two million won.

"2015 Highest 3154"

1. Defendant A

A. The criminal defendant's fraud is to pay the fixed amount per week of the mobile phone through the mobile phone to the neighbors, and there is no damage due to the payment of the horse price in full.

After opening a mobile phone in the name of the person in question, he had the mobile phone sold it to E, etc. and had the mobile phone purchaser in mind to gain profits equivalent to the price thereof.

Therefore, the Defendant, around March 11, 2015, opened the cell phone in the name of the elementary school and paid all the face value of the cell phone to F, an elementary school, and give a fixed amount of money per unit of the opened cell phone.

On March 12, 2015, F, which consented to the opening of the cell phone, applied for the purchase of a cell phone with the same attitude that F, using the cell phone in the name of F, would normally pay monthly telecommunications charges and terminal installment charges to the victim, and received a delivery from the injured party one unit of the 664G mobile phone (J).

However, even if the victim opens his/her mobile phone and takes place, the defendant thought that he/she would dispose of the amount of KRW 75-8 million per vehicle to the purchaser of his/her mobile phone, and take profits equivalent to the amount of the horse price, and did not think that he/she would have the owner of his/her mobile phone use it, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount of the horse price normally.

Accordingly, the Defendant received from the injured party one cell phone in an amount of KRW 974,00 from the market price of KRW 974,00, and received each mobile phone 25 mobile phone from November 25, 2014 to June 22, 2015 in total from November 25, 2014 to June 25, 2015.

B. The Defendant violated the Telecommunications Business Act (i.e., the Defendant) on April 17, 2015.