2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. Defendant B, C, D, and E committed a tort in collusion with each other in investigating grounds for disciplinary action, such as leaving the Plaintiff’s workplace without permission, taking away trees, and taking out trees, and thus, the act constitutes a tort in violation of the relevant laws and regulations, inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s misconduct was distorted and distorted and investigated the Plaintiff’s removal or dismissal.

B. At the time of the dismissal of the Plaintiff, the Disciplinary Committee did not bound to the purport of the judgment on revocation of the dismissal that was previously rendered, but committed a tort by disregarding it and by dismissal against the Plaintiff.

2. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 26, 27, and 1 of the judgment, the plaintiff was subject to removal for the reasons of four disciplinary reasons, including the receipt of money and valuables of KRW 200,000 in return for the removal of bank trees, ④ illegal construction, etc.; the plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of removal for the above removal on June 8, 2011; (1) the above disciplinary ground was not recognized, and (3) the grounds for disciplinary grounds were acknowledged, but they were dealt with with criminal charges, and (4) the Plaintiff’s spouse G in relation to the grounds for disciplinary grounds under the Building Act; (2) the appellate court rendered a decision to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the plaintiff violated his/her duty to maintain dignity; and (3) the above disciplinary ground was revoked for the reason that the plaintiff violated his/her duty to remove trees and the duty to maintain dignity again (Article 57(1)7) of the State Public Officials Act).