In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the fine shall be respectively imposed.

The Defendants were able to remove the said apartment in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the victim D, exercising the right of retention on the above apartment E in the event of the above apartment E, and installed a steel fence in the vicinity of the above apartment.

On December 13, 2015, the Defendants jointly destroyed 10 out of 14:13, 2015, with the pents installed by the victim D Co., Ltd. using Pokes, and removing pents, and removing pents, the market price of the victim’s ownership is unknown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement by the Defendants (as at the second public trial date);

1. Statement made by the F and G police statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (F photographic data submission), investigation report (a photographic and motion picture CD attachment);

1. The Defendants of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty Surcharge).

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act