beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.11.11 2014가단74370

소유권이전등기

Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for cancellation of the lease registration against Defendant C shall be dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant.

Reasons

1. As to the claim for cancellation of the right to lease against Defendant C, the Plaintiff Union requested the Defendant C to cancel the registration of the right to lease of housing stated in the purport of the claim for cancellation of the right to lease of housing as stated in the attached Table, which is examined ex officio as to the legitimacy

The registration of the right to lease of a house shall be completed by entrusting the registration to the competent registry after deeming that the application is reasonable by the court according to the lessee’s application for the order of lease registration. In order to cancel the registration where the registration is completed on the date of the court’s order of lease registration, an application for objection or cancellation on the decision of the order of lease registration and a judgment to cancel the said decision from the court shall be made by submitting the certified copy of the written judgment to the executive agency for the cancellation

(See Article 3-3(3) of the Housing Lease Protection Act (see Article 3-3(3) of the Housing Lease Protection Act). If special remedy is provided for the procedure of compulsory execution on cancellation of the housing lease registration, the Plaintiff Union can cancel the said registration by filing an objection or application for cancellation of the decision on the order of lease registration of a house, so the lawsuit of this case seeking cancellation of the housing lease registration against

Therefore, this part of the lawsuit is dismissed.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B and the claim against Defendant C for the delivery of real estate

A. 1) The Plaintiff Union: (a) removed 28 units of 730 units of 5 stories, 28 units of 5 stories, 730 units of Do, Changwon-si, and obtained authorization from the competent authority around December 23, 201, for the reconstruction thereof; (b) the Plaintiff Union received authorization for the implementation of the instant reconstruction project on November 21, 2013; (c) obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on July 21, 2014; and (d) obtained authorization for the management and disposal plan on July 21, 2014; and (e) obtained the said authorization for the management and disposal plan on July 21, 2014.