2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s vehicle is affiliated with the Trucking Mutual Aid Association, the Defendant recognized a crime and is in profoundly against the Defendant, and the Defendant’s economic situation is difficult.

However, the crime of this case is driving without completely correcting the fixed chain on the container installed on the cargo scraper.

It does not seem that the sentence of the court below is unreasonable, considering the fact that the defendant neglected to pay attention to the situation where the container was driven on the opposite line by shocking the victim's vehicle that was driven on the opposite line. In particular, considering the fact that the defendant, who is engaged in the driver's duty of cargo so that the container was driven on the dangerous condition to the extent that the container was separated and separated from the container, the defendant did not agree with the victim's bereaved family members, the fact that the defendant has a majority of the criminal history of the same kind of crime, and all other circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.