A. On September 23, 2015, the fact that the Plaintiff, while driving a C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C’s cruise car (hereinafter “instant car”) around 14:30 on September 23, 2015, caused the collision with D and caused injury to the Defendant, who was on the said E-car, on the part of D, was driving, due to the collision with D’s first tunnel for the D D’s Highway at the time of Jindo (hereinafter “instant accident”), may be recognized by each entry in the A’s No. 1, B’s No. 1, and 2(including the serial number).

B. According to the facts of recognition as the ground for the liability for damages, the Plaintiff, a driver of the instant passenger vehicle, is liable to the Defendant for the damages incurred by the instant accident, and in light of the circumstances of the instant accident, etc., it cannot be deemed that there was any error on the Defendant, who was accompanied by the automobile driven by D, and there is no reason to limit the Plaintiff’

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The parties' assertion 1) The defendant asserted that the defendant had a duty to compensate for the total amount of KRW 10,000 won (66 days x 160,000 won) due to the above defendant's loss of labor ability, since the defendant received a total of 66 days of medical treatment (13 days of hospital treatment and 53 days of hospital treatment) due to the accident in this case, he had a total of 16 days of hospital treatment (13 days of hospital treatment and 53 days of hospital treatment) and had a daily income of KRW 1,60,000 per day while working as a wood and steel rupture during the above hospital treatment period. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff has a duty to compensate the defendant for the total amount of KRW 1,056,00 (66 days x 166,00 won) due to the defendant's loss of labor ability. Accordingly, since the plaintiff's loss occurred to the defendant, the plaintiff has a duty to compensate for the defendant's tort 1,164,356 days of won (2.