음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is operating a singing practice hall with the trade name "C Sing practice hall" in Ansan-si, [2].
No person shall, for the purpose of profit-making, drink with customers, provide entertainment to customers by singing or dancing, or arrange any other person to provide entertainment to customers, while no person may sell or provide alcoholic beverages to customers.
1. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:15 on July 14, 2016, provided that, upon receiving a request from customers D, etc., the Defendant arranged to provide entertainment visitors by telephone (34 years of age, 55 years of age, and 55) to provide entertainment services while drinking alcohol with such customers as the above D, and sold two canes with a total of 6,00 won from the said customers and with two cans.
2. On August 3, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of August 3, 2016: (a) around 20:35, around August 2016, at the third room of the “C Singinging practice hall”, the Defendant offered female entertainment reception workers and assisted them to provide entertainment with dance while drinking alcohol with G, etc.; (b) received a total of KRW 9,000 from the said customers and sold cans with three cans.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;
1. A H statement;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Articles 34(2), 22(1)4 (a) of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the point of arranging entertainment activities), Articles 34(3)2 and 22(1)3 (the point of selling alcoholic beverages), and 22(1)3 of the Music Industry Promotion Act concerning facts constituting an offense; the choice of fines;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in the workhouse appears to have led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, the Defendant does not have been punished by imprisonment or heavier until now, and the Defendant’s child is rare disease.