A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Nos. 1 and 2 of seized evidence shall be charged to the defendant.

The defendant and the defense counsel explicitly withdrawn the assertion of mistake on the date of the first trial.

2. In light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant, who had the history of criminal punishment several times due to the same type of fraud in this case, was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and was committed again; (b) the Defendant committed fraud again; (c) the Defendant committed a planned and organized crime against many and unspecified persons; and (d) the Defendant committed a crime of causing serious economic damage to many and unspecified victims; and (c) the need for strict punishment as a crime undermining the security of credit transactions between public institutions and financial institutions under misrepresentation; and (d) the Defendant’s role in the Defendant was the formation of the scaming organization after receiving money from the victim; and (e) the Defendant’s total role was scaming out of the scaming organization, which was occupied in the entire crime.

그러나, 피고인이 이 사건 각 범행을 모두 시인하면서 그 잘못을 깊이 반성하고 있고, 사기 범행이 미수에 그쳤을 뿐만 아니라 공문서위조 범행 역시 행사에까지 나아가지 않아 범죄의 궁극적인 목적을 달성하지 못함으로써 사회적 위험이 현실화되지는 않은 점, 피고인이 장기간 궤양성 결장염을 앓고 있어 정상적인 사회생활을 하지 못하는 가운데 생활비 내지 치료비를 보탤 목적으로 단기 아르바이트 자리를 구하던 중 보이스피싱 범죄 가담의 유혹에 빠진 것으로 보이는 점, 피고인이 보이스피싱 범행에 가담한 기간이 비교적 짧고, 그 대가로 약속받은 금원이 10~30만 원에 불과하여 편취하려고 했던 금액(1,500만 원)에 비하여 소액인 점 등을 비롯하여 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성행, 환경, 범행 이후 정황 등 이 사건...