공갈
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.
2. We examine the judgment, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant's profit derived from the crime of this case seems not to be significant, the fact that there was no same criminal record is a favorable sentencing ground, and the fact that the 26 victims were charged with a total of about 71 million won, the fact that the victims did not agree with the victims, the fact that the victim did not agree with the victims, and the fact that the degree of the crime was not somewhat weak is an unfavorable sentencing ground.
In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.