On November 13, 2019, the Defendant pointed out that, around 10:10 on November 13, 2019, the Defendant’s insult in the vicinity of the main department of the first floor of the B Hospital located in Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by stating that, “In the vicinity of the main department of the first floor of the B Hospital located in Gwangju-dong, the Defendant pointed out that, while the persons related to the hospital in an infinite name and the patients are able to see the victim’s claim to the E and a large amount of the U.S. dollars of the same hospital, the victim was able to have the victim raised an objection from the victim, and that, in turn, the victim was physically insulting.”

B. On November 13, 2019, the Defendant, at the office of the B Hospital Trade Union, insulting the Defendant at around 10:30 on November 13, 2019.

After having a dispute with the victim like the same paragraph, the head of the trade union secretariat came to contact with the victim that the victim should go to the trade union office and the victim to the trade union office, the victim was found to be the head of the trade union B Hospital branch office in the first floor of the hospital and the head of the trade union branch in the first floor of the hospital, and the victim was found to be the victim while there were G et al. who was the head of the trade union branch office in the first floor of the hospital and the branch office in the first floor of the hospital, and it was difficult to find out where five years have elapsed since he went to the same year, but it was said that he would not live so. The victim was sexually insulting. Where so, where this year,

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is an offense subject to prosecution, which falls under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and is subject to prosecution only upon complaint under Article 312(1) of the same Act.

However, according to the records, on November 4, 2020, after the indictment of this case was filed, the agreement that the victim withdraws the complaint against the defendant and the withdrawal of the complaint can be recognized as being received in this court. Therefore, the victim's withdrawal of the complaint against the defendant is deemed to have been revoked. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.