However, comprehensively taking account of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, the fact that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the majority of the victims and the failure to recover damage, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.