beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.10.02 2014노1049

특수절도등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant recognized all the instant crimes, committed in depth and reflects the instant crimes, committed by his father, and committed so as not to make another work to live together with his or her father and find his or her jobs again, and is trying to repay damages to the victims due to his or her extremely high attendance. As such, the punishment imposed by the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) although the Defendant has committed the instant crime in depth during the past ten years; (b) there was no particular criminal force for the past ten years; and (c) the Defendant started to commit the instant crime by suffering from economic difficulties; (d) most of the instant crimes were committed by intrusion upon the victims’ residence; and (e) most of the instant crimes were committed several times within the short period; (e) the commission of the crime was bad; and (e) the amount of damage was not much recovered; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, criminal history, motive, means and consequence of the

Even if the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, it is not judged that the sentence should be reversed.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition