2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on November 8, 2015, with the nationality of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (Peoplele’s Republic of the Republic of Bangladesh), as a foreigner of C-3 (short-term visit) sojourn status on November 8, 2015.

B. On February 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a risk of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On May 26, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on December 7, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was served as a teacher in Bangladesh, from January 2015 to December 2017, the Plaintiff served as a unit of administration unit of B Party B (B political party; hereinafter “B political party”) of Bangladesh-si Party B (B political party; hereinafter “B political party”) from January 2015 to December 2017.

In addition, the plaintiff was engaged in activities as the central head of the teachers' union as a B-party support organization.

As a result of these activities of the plaintiff, the plaintiff was threatened by Cparty(C Party(C Party(hereinafter referred to as "C Party") supporters of the government and the ruling party(hereinafter referred to as "C Party"). On December 2012, the plaintiff's wife was 12 persons and 12 persons were involved in the police, and was released from the bail money. On January 2015, the plaintiff and her wife were involved in the police and was released from the bribe.