When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 8, 2017, at around 00:35, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim’s face and on the ground that the Defendant was able to see the entrance outside of the victim D(48 tax) and acting without brush when the Defendant was working in Gwangju City, around 00:35, on the ground that he was able to see the entrance outside the victim D(48 tax) and was able to do so without brucing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Evidence No. 13);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are recognized and reflected in the crime of this case, and the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, etc. shall be determined by taking into account all the factors of sentencing as indicated in the proceedings of pleadings of this case.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On November 8, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant assaulted the victim on the floor of hand, on the ground that the victim E (3 years old) who was next to the Defendant at the time of leaving D, said victim E (43 years old) was said to read it.

2. On the trial date of this case, the prosecutor revoked this part of the public prosecution.

3. In conclusion, since this part of the facts charged is deemed to have been revoked, a decision to dismiss this part of the public prosecution pursuant to Article 328(1)1 of the Criminal Procedure Act is rendered, since it constitutes a case where the public prosecution was revoked.