A. On August 11, 2014, Plaintiff A paid KRW 100,000 to the Defendant at the crowdfunding plant located in Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, and provided a package trading experience with Plaintiff A, who is the Defendant’s pilot for the crowdfunding flight experience.

B. D, after getting the Plaintiff A to board the Plaintiff A, took off from the perspective of the package-based crowdfunding plant due to the wind direction. While D had a change in the direction of the wind known by D, D had the said package-based strawer died of the flag of the package-based flag, which was installed in the part of the package-based marketing plant, while D had a change in the direction of the wind, the said package-based flager’s reduction was not going back in the future. Accordingly, Plaintiff A and D were scamed into the valley floor and fall.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

Plaintiff

A due to the instant accident, A suffered bodily injury, such as both sides, lower halfs, plebrusing, and plebraming damage, u fry fry, fry fry fry, and fry fry and falsary fry. D.

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the child of Plaintiff A.

E. On the other hand, the Defendant received flight experience costs from users who wanting to engage in crowdfunding flight experience, and let D and other pilots, who want to engage in the flight experience from parogle, set up an sequence and allow them to engage in the flight experience with users. D and other pilots obtained the remainder obtained from the Defendant less the Defendant’s share of the flight experience costs arising during the day from the Defendant, and divided equally.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including a branch number for those with a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence No. 9, witness D's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the accident of this case is of this case must be liable for damages to the plaintiffs as the user of D.

B. The defendant's assertion and D are merely the partnership relationship.