beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고정1783

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. No person charged of the instant case shall defame another person by openly pointing out any fact or false fact with intent to defame another person via an information and communications network;

Nevertheless, at around 02:54 on September 28, 2014, the Defendant is a scam room operated by the B B, which appears on the third floor, with a photo of the building signboards affixed to the “B”, which is operated by the injured party on the Internet-day website (htp:/www. Shebe.com).

I have drawn a photograph stamped at the Scagle while the principal is the president directly.

The outline of the liquor tax on the French movement.

In reference, I will not be able to engage in funeral services in low-building companies.

T. T. S. T. B. T. B., which is operated by B. B. B. B. B., a B. B. B. L., 100.

'The false facts were posted on the Internet bulletin board so that many unspecified people can see them.

Accordingly, with a view to slandering, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through information and communications networks.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested under Article 70(3) of the same Act.

According to the records, the victim expressed his/her intent not to have his/her punishment against the defendant on December 16, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.