However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2017 Highest 1006"

1. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant driven a BMW car without obtaining a driver’s license from around 1 1km section from around 09:35 to around 176 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

2. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. The Defendant forged a signature by stating that “G” is “G” in his own column without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her authority, by stating that, as if he/she was the Defendant’s seat, he/she would be subject to criminal punishment, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant was discovered to have been driving without a license, and was demanded by F to sign a letter of voluntary accompanying consent from F, which belongs to the police box of the Suwon-gu Police Station E box of the Suwon-gu Police Station.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a) above, exercised the foregoing investigation by delivering the letter of voluntary accompanying consent bearing the signature of the forged G name to Fman F, who is unaware of the fact that it was duly formed, and allowing him to file it on investigation records.

3. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, demanded a policeman to prepare and submit a written statement recognizing the commission of a crime from the police officer F at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph, and without authority, stated in the written statement provided by the above police officer without authority that “G”, “H” in the resident registration number column, and in the main text column of the document “A person himself/herself is driving without license as a driver of DMW vehicle,” and forged a copy of G’s private document concerning the certification of fact.

B. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) is deemed to have duly formed one copy of the written statement in the name of G forged at the same time and place.