If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 28, 2013, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s model B’s driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner of the Gyeongwon Police Agency, a public document in the name of the Defendant, which was in possession of the admission ticket in the Gangwon-do Office, the Gangwon-do Office, the Gangwon-do Office, the Gangwon-do Office, on September 28, 2013. On September 28, 2013, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s license as if he were the Defendant. On September 22:17, 2013, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s license as if he was the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. One copy of the police record, the list of seizure, and the photograph of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (nameed B telephone statement hearing of a driver's license);

1. Relevant Article 230 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 230 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;