[200] On August 2009, the Defendant knew that the victim was provided with the installation costs of workplace childcare facilities by the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service while operating the Daegu-gun E Child Care Center through the Defendant’s birth Da of the Victim C in the middle of August 2009, and was notified by the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service of the revocation of the decision to support the installation costs of workplace childcare facilities and the return of subsidies, and had the victim and D pay money to the victim and D as if the Defendant was the F of the Head of the Office F of the Office of Non-Gu Office.

1. On August 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, in the middle-gu G Hospital’s 7th floor room in Daegu-gu G Hospital, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s completion of the Defendant’s performance of the Defendant’s duty of care facility installation expenses and the Defendant’s performance of the Defendant’s senior position in the office of the Secretary F of the Cheong-gu Office, the Defendant could resolve the revocation of the decision to support the workplace childcare facility installation expenses and the refund of the subsidies.

However, the defendant did not have any relation with F, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to resolve the problem of revocation of the decision to support the cost of workplace childcare and the return of the subsidy.

Around August 23, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3.5 million won from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: H) in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

2. On August 28, 2009, the Defendant called the victim near the Daegu Daegu High Bus Terminal, Daegu, Daegu, 4,009, and asked the Prime Minister to give 3.5 million won to the person who has the Prime Minister’s control office, and thus, the problem of cancellation of the decision to support the installation cost of workplace childcare facilities and the refund of the subsidy is well resolved.