Examining the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the object of the crime of embezzlement or the intention of obtaining unlawful acquisition and the intention of obtaining fraud, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, in the judgment of the lower court that convicted all of the facts charged (excluding the part which was judged not guilty at the lower court

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.