beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.12 2018나511

공사대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any addition or modification as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

In light of the fact that: (a) the 5th parallel of the judgment of the court of first instance changed the “61.7 million won” to “6,750,000 won”; and (b) the 2nd parallel of the construction contract (Evidence A 1) against which the changed defendant asserts the establishment of the authenticity as follows: (a) the Defendant’s name (B) is written in the mutual column of the said contract; (b) the witness D of the court of first instance written the said contract with the Defendant’s name; and (c) the Defendant testified that there was no permission from the Defendant; (d) the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the establishment of the authenticity of the construction contract (Evidence A 1); and (e) there is no other evidence to prove the establishment of the authenticity.

Along with the same two pages 13 to 14, the phrase “(if there are paper numbers, including paper numbers)” is changed to the phrase “(if there are paper numbers, including paper numbers) of subparagraphs A through 4 and the fact-finding results of the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.