1. At around 20:00 on December 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim partially repaid the Defendant’s obligations to the Defendant, out of KRW 1,400,00,000, a part of the membership fee 1,400,000, paid to the Defendant, and requested the Defendant to repay the Defendant’s obligations to the victim; (b) on the part of the Defendant’s general affairs, the thief demanded the Defendant to pay the Defendant’s obligations; (c) however, the thief carried KRW 50,000,000,000,000, in cash owned by the victim on

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. Around December 25, 2013, the Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), was notified by the victim that he would not get any appraisal from the victim during the instant case that brought money to the victim without the victim D’s permission. However, around December 25, 2013, the Defendant violated the victim’s house and door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door of the victim and the victim’s house were opened and intruded to the living room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (an investigation into a site officer upon receipt of the initial report);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one day per 100,000 won);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2001Do