However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 18, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of one million won of a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on January 18, 2008, and on January 22, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of three million won of a fine at the Suwon District Court on January 22, 2009.

On May 12, 2013, at around 15:29, the Defendant driven a DNA siren car with a blood alcohol content of 0.110%, while under the influence of alcohol on May 12, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving, and investigation report (number of drinking driving);

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copy of judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is divided in depth; (b) the Defendant was punished for a crime committed for about five years before he was punished for such a crime; and (c) there was no past record of the punishment heavier than that of the suspended sentence, in addition to the punishment for a crime committed for ten years before he was punished for the suspended sentence; and (d) “the previous record of a drunk driving twice or more” was committed before the enforcement of the current Road Traffic Act, which

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of community service and lecture attendance order;