For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendant of violating the National Land Planning and Utilization Act among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the interpretation of Article 11(3) and (5) of the Building Act and Articles 56(1) and 57(1) of the former National Land Planning and Utilization Act (amended by Act No. 15727, Aug. 14, 2018).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.