If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 14:00 on September 29, 2010, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court 559, located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court at Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court at the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court on September 29, 2010, the Defendant: (a) did not have any fact that the victim D, who was a pastors prior to the C church, purchased the house of his children with the church funds or used it for private use; (b) did not have any fact that the victim D, who purchased the house of his children with the church funds; (c) did not have any private use of the KRW 100 million, such as E, F, G, H, and H, who is a person related to the Orak-si Branch; and (d) continued to damage the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in the place where “D tree was located in G, H, and the attorney at the above legal corridor.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Partial entry of the police interrogation protocol of the first and second police officers against the defendant;

1. Some of the third police interrogation protocol against the accused (including D substitute part);

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Complaint;

1. A certificate;

1. A certified copy of each register, each real estate sales contract, each written confirmation of transactions, and each real estate lease contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear and report the identity of the complainantD telephone statement);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;