특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal did not recognize the fact of the instant accident. Even if the Defendant knew of such fact, the victim’s injury was not caused by the instant accident or was extremely minor and thus, the Defendant had a criminal intent to escape.
Although it cannot be deemed that there was a need to take relief measures, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, it erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the
2. The defendant and his defense counsel argued the same purport as the grounds for appeal of this case in the court below, and the court below rejected the above assertion by explaining the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion under the title "a decision on the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion" in the court decision. In light of the above judgment of the court below compared with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts or in the misunderstanding of legal principles, which affected the conclusion
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.