beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2014.10.28 2014고단406

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2014, around 22:35, the Defendant reported that he was frighting at the Fnisher 201 House E, a Fnisher 201, and received a 112 report that he was frighting, and requested to verify the identity of the police officer assigned to the Y, Defendant A, upon receipt of a request for identification from the H.

e. Chewing typule;

"In doing so, the hump was assaulted twice by the hums of the above h with the hums.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reported duties.

2. Defendant B

A. Definite Defendant, at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as the above Paragraph 1 above, insulting the victims of the Chungcheongnam-gu Police Station G police box sent to the scene on the same grounds as the above Paragraph 1 above, and during the hearing of the J, etc. operating the said FJ, etc., the Defendant sexually insultinged the victims of the Hashes, Hashes, Hashes, Hashes, Hashes, Hashes. Hashes, Hashes, Hashes. Hashes. Hashes. Hashes, Hashes bits bits. Hashes, Mashes bits bits. Hashes bits bits.”

B. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 23:20, the Defendant demanded a G police box located in K for the same reason as that of the foregoing paragraph (1) to unbring A arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reason as that of the foregoing paragraph; and (b) committed an act of disturbanceing a bath and sacrificing for about one hour and ten (10) minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, I, L, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of revocation at the government office)

1. Defendant B of the ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (mutually among the crimes of insult);

1. Defendant A: Defendant B who is subject to a fine: The choice of a fine;

1. Defendant B among concurrent crimes: the punishment under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is added;